QR Code for this page

Governance for Agentic AI

Traditional governance frameworks assume predictable, bounded systems. Agentic AI may challenge these assumptions.

Security Framework Analysis

Framework Organization Agentic Coverage Status Last Update
OWASP GenAI Security OWASP Foundation Most Comprehensive Extensive agentic threats coverage April 2025
MITRE ATLAS MITRE Corporation Strong Excellent LLM coverage, limited MCP April 2025
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 ISO/IEC Limited General AI governance focus December 2023
NIST AI RMF NIST (US) Limited Traditional AI risk management July 2024
CIS Controls Center for Internet Security Minimal General cybersecurity focus May 2024

Critical Gaps

MCP Security
Model Context Protocol vulnerabilities largely unaddressed across frameworks. E.g. Rug pull attacks are a major concern.
Multi-Agent Threats
Agent-to-agent attack patterns, trust exploitation, and coordination failures have limited coverage in existing frameworks.
Temporal Behaviors
Agent drift, behavioral evolution over time, and "sleeper agent" patterns are largely unaddressed.

Immediate Actions

Implement Tool Validation
Consider implementing protection against tool poisoning vulnerabilities in MCP implementations.
# Basic MCP scanning
uvx mcp-scan@latest

# Validate all tool descriptions before agent execution
Review Security Frameworks
Evaluate available frameworks for agentic AI security guidance. Consider starting with OWASP GenAI Security for comprehensive threat coverage, supplemented by MITRE ATLAS for LLM-specific patterns.
Create Agent Registry
Track capabilities and interaction permissions for all agents. Focus on autonomy levels and decision rights rather than just identities.
Monitor Temporal Behavior
Implement session limits and behavioral baseline monitoring to prevent behavioral drift and detect unusual patterns over time.

Agent Card System

When you can't predict behavior, you must track capabilities. The Agent Card system provides essential governance information for every AI agent.

Essential Agent Information

Risk Level Critical / High / Medium / Low
Autonomy Level 0-5 scale of independence
Memory Type Session / Working / Persistent
Decision Rights Boundaries and permissions
Owner Accountable team/individual
Review Date Next governance review
Interaction Permissions Which agents can coordinate
Monitoring Behavioral indicators and alerts
# Agent Card Template
Agent Name: [Descriptive name]
Agent ID: [Unique identifier]
Version: [Semantic versioning]
Owner: [Responsible team/person]
Review Date: [Next review]

Risk Level: CRITICAL | HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW
Autonomy Level: 0-5 (0=human performs all, 5=irreversible decisions)

Decision Rights:
  - Max Transaction: [Dollar amount]
  - Data Access: [Scope limitations]
  - System Changes: [What can be modified]

Memory Type: SESSION | WORKING | PERSISTENT
Can Coordinate With: [List of agent IDs]
Forbidden Interactions: [Restricted agents]

Behavioral Indicators:
  - Normal patterns: [Expected behavior]
  - Warning signs: [Drift indicators]
  - Critical alerts: [Immediate escalation]

Important Disclaimer

This governance guidance is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered as legal, compliance, or security advice. Framework evaluations are based on publicly available information and may not reflect the most current versions. Organizations should conduct their own security assessments and consult with qualified cybersecurity and legal professionals before implementing any agentic AI systems. Regulatory requirements vary by jurisdiction and industry.